"Old Hulbird took the
opportunity to read to me a full blooded lecture, in the style of an American
oration, as to the perils of a young American girlhood lurking in the European jungle"
(Three Soldiers Ford)
The perceptions of places
based on an experience of a person often leads to the differences between them,
the simplicity of altering one perceptions of a place by a quick glance, a
quick note of judgment is something that tends to create untruthfulness or to not
demonstrate the whole entire picture. Like a photograph cutting the reality
into a square box where all you see is what you choose to see, not cutting the
corners or venturing further, but leaving this view of ones, to the deteriorating
and accumulation of dust that forms on the creases of the now abandoned
photograph. This European jungle that the father of Florence in the Three Soldiers by Ford Madox shows just
how a squared orientation can sometimes cause to rebel, to have a wantingness
to see the other sides of the story. “ He said that Paris was full of snakes in
the grass, of which he had bitter experience, he concluded as they always do,
poor, dear old things with the aspiration that all American woman should one be
sexless, though that is not they way they put it…”(Madox).
This
desire to walk the lands of where the most famous artists, poets, writers,
performers, and musicians roamed like free spirits all intertwined in this drug
like passion that filled their every desire. Like Florence who dreamed and
wanted a husband that would bring her to this European atmosphere, this new
place where she could grow in society, be well off, and make a good life for
herself, a dryness that often resembled the attitude to love with how the Americans
encountered in Ford Madox’s reality, perceived the truth and love. “On the 1st
of august Florence apparently told her aunts that she intended to marry me”
(Madox), this harshness and bluntness of the decision to marry lacks a exoticness,
lacks that lust, that desire for him.
The way they talk about one
another is with a taste of bitterness, it makes the reader feel the real
dislike that he has for her, describing her as if he “Had been given a thin
shelled pullet egg to carry on my (his) palm from equatorial Africa to Hoboken”
(Madox). This view of his wife rather degusts one, perhaps she is frail and
small and frightened, but love is not meant to bring you down its mean to bring
you up. The style of writing shows a one sided view, one of injustices and
perhaps not the truth of the situation. It shows a lack of understanding of
what love even means, or what it is to love, the narrator seems to have no real
grasp of what this in factious thing called love is. Said to be an unreliable
narrator, this objectification of this women is something that frustrates the
reader, when one doesn’t truly love one and just sees as a trophy to have evidentially
if a cheating act happens the dislikes come together for that person and create
great turmoil. However if he had truly loved her, the way he would have written
abut her cheat would not have been the same way perhaps. For to love is
something that encapsulates you, with feelings of desire of beauty of a
calmness that someone knows all of you and accepts that and will continue to be
with you and care for you. To love is something so rare, so innocent, like a child’s
mind, it has a purity that humans are lacking today, the embrace from your
lover can fill the deepest holes buried deep within you, make you feel whole,
like a ripe, luscious peach on a summer’s day, or the beauty and simplicity of
one snowflake in the multitude of snowflakes in a raining sky. Evidently the way she cheats on him in the
story conjures up a sourness, however he never loved her really, and thus the accumulative
dislikes he shared for her seem to rise like a stubborn child and unleashes
itself on the pages of the Three Soldiers.
However Ford Madox when
describing Paris there is a greater love found there, which is ironic for
through the character of his Three Soldiers
it shows this dislike for it. The ways of communication can alter in each
writers pieces, like an artist, each painting is never always happy or sad,
there is a mix of the subject matter. When one learns ones perception alters
with it, the truth is uncovered and the real reality comes through. Taking away
the eyes of love and hatred its becomes easier to perceive what the truth is,
often a challenge for judgment runs through the veins of humans, its what this
whole world runs on. What, who and whom we dislike or like, why we like or
dislike it, all these relate to one another. Our visions are all based on the
experiences we’ve had with someone or something that perhaps resembles the
object in front. Like A Paris Letter,
the perception of Paris as a female and her embodiment is one of great
admiration for her capabilities to remain so beautiful despite constant bashes;
“It is really the most wonderful of international phenomena. For she is the
unchanging heart of a land that has survived unnumbered invasions” – “she has
survived because the imaginations her poets in ink, colours, sounds of stones,
have given to her vision o an unrivalled clarity, a frigid rectitude, an almost
unthinkable resilience”- (Madox). A paradise for artists, Madox sees truth,
sees the magical body that of which is Paris, “Her poets have at once breathed
into her life and inspiration and conferred on her unchanging immortality”-
“not so much by chanting land of hope and glory but by crooning those little
songs to the hurdy gurdy that are Paris and France”(Maddox). The style of
writing alludes to great vision of Paris; he demonstrates his reality with a straightforwardness
view. I feel this is similar with communications between a European and an
American, the American writer I feel will spare the details and be rather blunt
with the facts whereas the European writer will go beyond and search for every
detail, even if it seems unnecessary, it is the words that aid the reader to
get a better illustration of the writers truth or fictional truth.
This idea of what is true
and what is false, what is an exaggeration is something that the past readings
have conjured up questions about what is right and wrong. In the passage in Hemingway’s
a Moveable Feast, sitting in a little café Hemingway is joined by Madox, and
his reaction is not necessary the kindest gesture, “I took a drink to see if
his coming had fouled it, but it still tasted good” talking about Maodx-
bringing foulness wherever he goes. However “He was a good companion until he
drank too much and, at that time, when he was lying, he was more interesting
than many men telling a story truly” (Hemingway). This idea of telling the
truth and exaggerating a fact, can aid to create something that is far more
interesting- often when writing or telling stories exaggeration, or enhancement
of the object, is always a little more interesting and more enjoyable to read.
The reality is never perfect, or as romantic as we say it is, but we find symbolism
that can influence the way we perceive things that allude to a more romanticized
view or a more negative view, a sadder view, or happier view. Perceptions of a
reality is very personal and allows to reader to get in touch with the mind of
the writer, it perhaps is altered or people have been left out like a ‘cad’,
but it allures the reader to want to read more.
Saturday 17 2014,
Applying my last touch of
dark rouge lipstick I walked down the winding stairs on the uneven wooden
boards, slightly creaking with each step when touched by the short heels on my
new velvet boots. It was a cooler night, summer was ending and we had begun to
enter the fall mood, walking with anticipation to meet him. The streets were
alive with hustle and bustle, I could hear music coming from the open apartment
windows, and groups of friends laughing as I walked past them, passing
galleries that were packed with characters of the night sipping on wine, the
metro a whole new underground world. Musicians playing their instruments while
the youth gets tipsy on cheap wine, adults looking down on them yet keeping a
twinkle of remembrance in their eyes of the times they were there. Hoping off
the metro I walked to this little bar where he was waiting for me, walking in
my heart beating faster, there I saw him, smiling at me while he walked towards
me and with a kiss, I knew this was going to be a great night. Being a part of
a group of friends laughing, discussing topics from arts to math’s, as the
night went on I began to grow tired from this nights endeavors, he looked at me
and took my hand, stepped outside and got in a taxi. With my hand in his we
looked out the window of the dark musty taxi, the views of Paris in my blurry
state were undeniably beautiful. Passing the delicately lit up seine, and
moonlight lit trees, dim lighted apartments, and comedic drunks attempting to
walk straight. He kissed by neck and whispered “tu est aussi belle que la
cite”, Paris with its imperfections and cracks remains to be so beautiful and
bright, even in the dark there is still beauty to be found.
This view of Paris as this
beautiful place, unaltered from the past, it feeds a hunger that artists
desire, the style of writing between Hemingway’s Paris and madox’s Paris, shows
great similarity. Yet the way of writing is very different, the harshness and
dryness of madox’s writing is rather stubborn and blunt however the way Hemingway
describes it is with great admiration even though she is not perfect, he
remains infatuated by her. Communication is something of a myth, for there
always seems to be perceptions and opinions that all alter the way people see
things, when people communicate we often hear differently from what the person
is saying, or understand what wed like to understand. Communication is not as
easy as most people would like to think, there are differences in each culture
how to express oneself, there is a constant debate wither what is being said is
in fact what you see, what you mean, what you feel or if its an exaggeration or
a illusion or a mask of what is truly inside ones head. Like In Hemingway’s a
moveable feast, Madox being rude to Belloc, Hemingway being embarrassed
thinking that it’s rude of madox to not be kinder to an author that he inspires
by. Yet when Hemingway discusses with someone who is close to him and who
admits that the one to be thought Belloc was in fact Aleister Crowley; “the diabolist, he’s supposed to be the
wickedest man in the world” in which he replies ‘sorry’. Perception is a great
thing and wither the reality of these authors are true or not, it shapes our
perceptions of the characters and places they discuss, like what I write here
will give someone a perception of one of my nights out in Paris. Each writer
here has a different view of this city yet they all in agreement with raw
nature of her being, as they sit at cafes and ponder on the world they live in
while sipping on Chambery vermouth and cassis, they remain indulged in their
own reality, and will remain writing about how they perceive to be this
European Jungle.
No comments:
Post a Comment